It's not going to die tomorrow just because we switch to Wayland compositors. As long as your Wayland session includes XWayland (which it will, probably for ever) and your applications retain a X11 backend, this will still work. Not to mention, if "ssh -X " and friends suits you. Supporting X11-style network transparency in the Wayland protocol is a futile exercise which compromises the simplicity required by the Wayland model. Press the Google Assistant button on the remote and ask to search for specific shows, or search by mood, genre, actress, and more. Our keys are original from the manufacturer to offer a perfect finish & smooth touch to your keyboard. Similar solutions can be implemented in Wayland and they don't need the protocol to become networks transparent. Buy individual Google ChromeBook keyboard replacement keys online at market-leading prices from Replacement Laptop Keys. There is no installation for this program, just extract the exe file from the zip archive and put it into the folder where ImgBurn lives. People have been pushed to replace "ssh -X" with NX and Xpra (or, in despair, VNC) because of these limitations (Google about them). This little freeware tool plots pretty graphs using ImgBurn's IBG data files (they contain information captured during the burn). No application I actually use supports detaching and re-attaching to a different X server. Let's not even think of running Kate from home. Qt4 applications with the default raster backend work poorly sometimes even my workplace's GbE LAN (Qt5 doesn't even give you the option). An increasing number of applications work poorly over this links. 3b66713 Update to build against libchrome-271506. ![]() And it's not the best way.ĭespite all the features available in X, application developers give limited effort to making applications work well over high latency limited bandwidth. Clone this repo: 1eba049 Fix warnings reported by cpplint. They want to be able to remotely run individual graphical applications.īut X11-style network transparency isn't the only way. Maybe X11 doesn't let you do some things that really are better (I wouldn't know, the only annoyance I have ever found with X11 code is that its error handler calls exit(-1) if it panics without letting you deal with it in the calling program, meaning you have to split display and core logic into two processes instead of being able to keep everything in one address space), but network transparency (what else do you call being able to say DISPLAY=whatever:X.Y my_program) is a core capability that people do use, and you won't get them on board if you turn it into an afterthought.ĩ9% of people don't want X11 style network transparency. Being able to display output (from a single window, mostly text and line art graphs, not the whole damn desktop) to a different machine across the building is not cosmetic, it is why I use Linux instead of Windows. Bells and whistles in the window manager are cosmetic. And my reply is always the same: if you make a change, improve the whole system don't make compromises to core functionality for the sake of cosmetic improvments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |